Local Government re-organisation is a distraction from the very real issue of unfair Government funding of local authorities and the growing challenge of sustainable funding for social care services. However, if local government reorganisation has to happen, there should be one Nottingham and one council for an expanded city – not the current muddle of six councils that people in the urban parts of the conurbation are living with now.
The existing boundary between Nottingham and Nottinghamshire is an nonsensical anomaly from the 1998 local government reorganisation, leaving Nottingham at a disadvantage over other cities. Any local government reorganisation needs to be sustainable and future-proof and that should include a single council that serves the whole of urban Nottingham. Proposals based only on the County boundary would stifle Nottingham and Nottinghamshire’s potential growth and reduce accountability for city services. A new large county unitary’s focus would be diluted if it was trying to deliver services to former coalfields and growing market towns as well as fulfilling metropolitan duties in an arbitrary ring around Nottingham.
Currently, less than half (48.7%) of those who work in the city also live in the city – significantly less than for other comparable cities such as Sheffield (75.7%) and Leeds (70.5%.) Many people from outside the city make use of city services and its infrastructure and enjoy it as a destination for leisure, entertainment and shopping. But their Council Tax doesn’t contribute to funding the city services they use regularly and they are not in a position to hold Nottingham’s decision makers to account for choices made in the city that can significantly affect their daily lives.
The City Council has submitted a response to the County Council’s consultation into their plans and City residents should respond as well. There are ramifications for city residents if the County Council goes ahead with its proposals as currently drafted. The County Council’s proposals and consultation can be seen here: http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/local/future-nottinghamshire
Nottingham City Council has long held the ambition to develop the Waterside area close to the city centre and this week Executive Board was proud to approve consultation of the planning document which sets out our ambition and gives future developers guidance on how to meet those aspirations. The bank of the River Trent is one of Nottingham’s greatest assets, but other than Victoria Embankment, it is an asset that is currently underutilised.
The opportunity to develop the area with high quality new homes, a new school, new transport links while also preserving and enhancing the unique riverside location and green space is one we should take. Our plans lay out the creation of a new residential community with its own identity and character. It’s hoped that people will be able to enjoy the best of contemporary living, in a healthy, sustainable and vibrant riverside setting. I want to see new developments which will provide improvements to public spaces, including a cycling and walking path and green space along the river bank connecting the Nottingham and Beeston Canal towpath with the Victoria Embankment through to Colwick Park.
Due to the scale of change envisaged for the 27-hectare site, the council will control the level, type and timings of the change required ensuring that the area’s best assets are retained and used in the best way possible. The City Council will work with developers and landowners to implement new development schemes in line with the planning guidance in phases.
Over the last few years a number of regeneration projects have been completed close to the Waterside area and include upgrades to Nottingham Station, a new retail development at Eastpoint on Daleside Road and successful eco-home schemes in the Meadows. Housing developments are also under construction along Arkwright Walk, Queens Road and Saffron Court on Crocus Street.
Though the Waterside development is many years off from being realised, this week is a landmark in its journey. I look forward to the consultation launching in the beginning of November and hope as many people as possible will take part in it.
Reports are saying the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) plans to halt the full rollout of Universal Credit. If the Government is finally recognising this is a flawed system, then that’s welcome, but if that means they are halting Universal Credit roll-out, it needs to stop immediately in Nottingham.
In July, I called for the rollout of Universal Credit to be halted before it inflicts more pain on families in Nottingham. The limited experience of Universal Credit so far in Nottingham has seen risinig levels of rent arrears along with more debt problems. It’s high time the Department for Work and Pensions accepted that the way they have implemented Universal Credit so far is actively hurting the people it is there to help. It’s totally unacceptable for them to simply plough on regardless while it damages people’s lives, driving them into debt and needing to use foodbanks.
There has been a chorus of opposition to the Government’s flagship welfare reform and a list of examples exposing the inherent flaw and problems with its implementation:
These problems have emerged while only a fraction of the total number of benefit claimants have been placed on Universal Credit. The Government should take this as a chance to stop the process, and fix the obvious problems that exist, otherwise they will be knowingly inflicting the same pain on more families in Nottingham and millions of other claimants due to be placed on Universal Credit.
Last November Nottingham City Council passed a motion calling on the Government to remove the Housing Revenue Account borrowing cap. Just under 12 months later, the Government has finally listened and is recognising councils as essential in tackling the UK’s housing crisis.
Nottingham City Council has embarked on the biggest new Council house building programe in a generation, building 404 council homes since 2015 and aiming to build 2500 homes that Nottingham people can affordable to rent or buy by May next year. The council has created award winning quality developments in partnership with Nottingham City Homes and last year Nottingham City Homes built more new homes than any other Arm’s Length Management Organisation in the Country. We always aim to do more, however, two issues have prevented this:
- Councils are only allowed to use right to buy receipts to fund 30% of the cost of a scheme, the remainder must be funded through borrowing on the Housing Revenue Account which is in turn limited by central Government;
- Councils are only allowed to spend the money on a very narrow range of housing types and it cannot be given to Nottingham City Homes to support them with the costs of homes they are building to own for themselves.
Earlier this summer a lift on the borrowing cap was proposed but was based on criteria which would have had nothing to do with demand or affordability, instead simply relying on a crude comparison between housing association social rents and private rents where only 104 Councils could extend their borrowing cap – 91 of which are in the South of England.
The Government’s latest announcement thankfully extends this to all councils meaning areas with high demand like Nottingham will be able to get on with building the new homes that local people need. Crucial to solving the UK’s housing crisis is ensuring that we build a mix of council homes, aspiration family housing and bungalows. The lifting of the HRA borrowing cap will allow is to achieve this in the numbers we need and I welcome the Prime Minister’s announcement last week.
The consultation on a new Central Library has now closed and the result was pretty clear – people like the idea of a new Central Library that we can design and build from scratch to best suit the city’s and our children’s needs for the future.
Over 85% of respondents said they would like to see a new library located in the revamped Broadmarsh area – many seeing it as a good addition to the emerging new site. The redevelopment of the Broadmarsh area will transform this area of the city. Adding state of the art children’s facilities in a new high quality Central Library will make this an even better development for Nottingham.
I know it’s taken some time, and I know there is the potential for some disruption, but everything is being planned carefully to make sure we make the most of the opportunity to completely change the Broadmarsh area for the better. Though the consultation has ended, the Council will continue to look to local people for input into the design and layout of the new library to help make it an inspirational space for Nottingham’s residents and visitors.
As UNESCO City of Literature Nottingham has a rich literacy heritage and children’s literacy is a big priority for us. A new Central Library could give Nottingham children access to books, learning, imagination and ideas.
The response to the consultation shows how important libraries still are to the people of Nottingham and we are committed to creating an imaginative and innovative space for young children in particular, although we aim to encourage all walks of life to use the library spaces and to embrace and enjoy opportunities for lifelong learning and development.
A copy of my published letter to the Guardian on the unfair funding of local authorities.
“Owen Jones (A quiet crisis? No, we’re just not listening, 13 September) is right that Brexit is overshadowing the issue of crippling government cuts to council funding. This is a national scandal that is having and will continue to have an impact on people’s lives at least as significant as Brexit. Eight years of austerity has seen Nottingham’s main government funding slashed from £127m to £25m, despite the city council serving some of the most disadvantaged communities in the country. Councils serving affluent areas are not only getting a better deal under the government’s unfair funding formula, but have also benefited from extra government handouts over the last few years.
Surrey county council, one of the wealthiest authorities in the country, benefited from £24m of a fund designed to soften the blow of the cuts – the most for any council – while councils like ours received nothing. The government has refused to tell us its criteria for allocation. However, what’s clear is that Conservative-led authorities benefited from 89% of the £300m provided over two years, and are now set to get 86% of the further £153m being allocated under a new scheme. Surrey will get £17m and, again, we get nothing.
It’s high time that this was taken seriously at a national level, given the devastating effect that austerity is having on our communities.”